Dissertation research journal, editorial design
Design for Accessibility and Inclusion
My degree dissertation, designed as a book that practises what it argues.
Scroll inside the reader to turn the pages. Zoom in to read the small print.
Design for Accessibility and Inclusion is my Level 6 research journal for my BA (Hons) Design degree. The essay asks whether frameworks such as the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG 2.2) and the UK Equality Act 2010 give designers room for creative problem solving, or reduce accessibility to a box ticked for compliance.
It works through typography, colour, user interface design and artificial intelligence, then tests the ideas against real practice: Microsoft's participatory Inclusive Design Toolkit set against Apple's system level features such as VoiceOver and Dynamic Type, and Dove's Real Beauty campaign set against US labour statistics on disability and employment. The conclusion is that accessibility works best as an ongoing process led by empathy rather than a checklist, and that it is a creative strategy and an ethical obligation at the same time.
The journal is designed to practise what it argues. The cover title is translated into Braille, so the message can be felt as well as read. Colour blindness test dots open the book, an apple split four ways shows the same colours through normal vision, deuteranopia, protanopia and tritanopia, and contrast ratio guides show the WCAG thresholds rather than just quoting them. A spread built around You will read this first shows visual hierarchy doing its job as you read it, and the body text is set in Open Dyslexic, even though the essay notes the evidence for dyslexia fonts is limited.
- Square journal with 56 numbered pages, plus covers
- Six themed chapters, from typography to ethics and representation
- Title set in Braille on the cover
- Colour vision and contrast spreads that show the guidelines in use
- Body text set in Open Dyslexic
- Hot pink and charcoal system, carried through to a QR code on the back cover
Accessibility should be understood as an iterative process rather than a checklist.
The argumentWant design that works for everyone?
Tell me what you're building and get a clear, fixed quote within one working day.